Gun Control Essay Example for Free

gunmanman Control EssayGun control has been a debat suitable issue for all whiles. This essay aims to put forward an argument against weapon control. The essay asserts that prevalence of gun control should not be a part of the society. Society should be against gun control because people should be able to protect themselves, the crime rate would decrease, and people have the right to bear arms.Discussion The controversy regarding the gun control is neither a new wiz nor particular to United States. Majority of the gun control legalitys make no demarcation between the citizens who ar law breakers and those who are law abiding.Gun control laws simply entail that anyone who possess a gun is likely to be a law breaker, which is merely not a case (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 01). The usance behind the gun control and gun crime laws is to avert the criminals from acquiring guns and utilize the guns they had acquired. However, the number of armed crimes as well as criminals has ampl ified during the time when gun control laws have thrived. It appears as if the actual results of gun control have not been the projected ones (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 02).Gun control laws restricts the ordinary citizens from possessing a gun, which implies that at the time of a criminal attack or a robbery, the citizen will not be likely to defend him or herself. The self defense survey conducted by Dr. Gary Kleeck shows that around 2. 1 million times, guns are used for self defense purpose in a year (Krouse, pp. 13). A gun control law will restrain the people from protecting themselves in case of a violent crime attack. This will enable the criminals to be more powerful and confident(p) while attacking people as people would not be armed.For instance pizza delivery boys keep guns to prevent themselves from being robbed. Thus, society should be against gun control because people have a right to protect and defend themselves. Imposing gun control laws do not reduce crimes. However, gu ns in the hands of those citizens who are law abiding and physically less strong than the criminals, are the best preventions for the crimes (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 02). Criminals are provoked by self-protection and guns can so be a disincentive. A majority of convicted American criminals have reported that they fear from attacking the victims who are armed.Their fear of encountering armed victims surpasses their fear of being caught by police (Lott, pp. 05). Robbers do not attempt to break into houses after midnight because of the probability of being shot. Thus, society should be against gun control because crimes will decrease. Keeping guns and using them for self defense is a right of the citizens as laid by the constitution. The constitution wants its citizens to possess guns in order to protect and defend themselves from the criminals or the totalism of their own government.Other than the constitutional right, self defense by keeping guns is also an inherent basic human right of the people (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 27-29). Therefore, society should be against gun control as people have a right to bear arms. Conclusion Most of the criminals acquire guns from illegal sources. Gun control laws therefore, are not able to restrict criminals. They only restrain law abiding citizens from possessing guns which increases the crime violence therefore, society should be against gun control because people should be able to protect themselves, the crime rate would decrease, and people have the right to bear arms.