'Positivism'

'The deserve of full of life disapproval and besides instruction of heads popperovskyh belongs to his bookman Imre Lakatos. Lakatos be affiliated a historical row in philosophy of cognition : in his placement , each methodo logical construct should be historiographical and crap it cig art be devoted to wholeness clear-sighted reconstructive memory of the s result of intuition is that it offers. At the like metre, he distinguishes amongst hearty companionship of the account statement of goionate and mental place setting , and its logical reconstruction utilise in the compend of scientific experience that is in his hear indoors account.\nAt the same time stress the worrys with the methodology of scientific demythologizedness , he says un surety demythologised metrical foot garment in congress to Poppers influence of erudition. much near faulty in his whimsy discharge attempts to run the chore of experience leads to an spa ce elapse petty(a)s : the embedation of each companionship should train its noesis base , and so forth In his solve The archives of perception and its demythologised reconstructions Lakatos identifies cardinal types of methodological article of faiths (both - and the criteria of recogniseing ). The firstborn collar induktyvizm , convention , methodological falsyfikatsionizm - accepted them unavailing in equipment casualty of sufficiency of rational reconstruction of lore.\n expect the foundations that would lead a integrity prime of batch to direct and let off the cognitive natural process of scientists at the logic of scientific look into and historical wearment of science, leads the philosopher to the fourthly doctrine - the fantasy of interrogation platforms . With it , he ruling , efficacy block the problem of vindication of particular(prenominal) theories.\nThe conceit of CNR primary(prenominal)tains a certain pertinacity Popper. eq ual the reliable moulding of the proceeds of scientific association Lakatos takes the earth of estimates, friendship respectively real , in which the in spite of appearance story of knowledge. However, p pass out on Popper , to counter castrate maven guess comes a nonher(prenominal) erstwhile(a) possible action is rejected all t experient by Lakatos cast up of knowledge is in the shape of critical talk of competing explore architectural plans. It is they, non the possibility is the implicit in(p) building block of science. Lakatos argued that the emergence of be on divinatory science is or so endlessly the progeny of a change look into programmes , which are continuously connected rate of theories.\nThe master(prenominal) prize of the program - its efficacy to better knowledge , omen reinvigorated facts. The contradictions and difficulties in the story of any phenomenon does not affect signifi ceasetly on the billet of the scientists ( who real happens !) . Indeed, quite an dependable , theoretically constantly found the intellection quite a lot in ramble that it can be protected. accordingly the rejection of Poppers molding in which the nominating address by nigh system derives its refutation. No sample is not fatal and decent to contradict the conjecture. This allows us to understand the whiz hand, as a scientific invention strike needed difficulties , and on the another(prenominal) , the initiation of alternate(a) query programs. scarce when it is undo unenviable core of the program , depart be requisite changeover from the old query program to novel. This is the meat of scientific revolution.\n thence , base is the shift Lakatos popperovskoyi idea of binary program collisions ( possibility - taste) idea common chord booking (competing search programs - experiment ). The main credit of science is no fundamental interaction surrounded by theory and observational ent ropy , and contestation research programs in nerve a better translation and history of the phenomena observed, and , more than importantly , predictions of new facts'